Sports agencies weren’t always a thing of the past. Up until
the past few decades, athletes would rely on their families, mainly their
fathers and family lawyers to assist in their contract negotiations. In recent
years, there has been a significant increase in the number of individuals
wanting to represent professional athletes. This increase can easily be
explained by the high-profile status the sports industry has gained over recent
years.
The great increase in salaries, sponsorships and benefits in
professional sports have significantly expanded the need for the services that
these “modernized” athletes require from agents. Today, agent representation of
athletes has become a standard practice due to the increase in popularity
surrounding the industry. Contract negotiations performed by today’s agents are
a small part of their job functions. Today’s agents go as far as work with
their clients’ financial advisers, marketing executives, insurance agents, tax
professionals, travel agents as well as dealing with endorsements, promotions,
appearances and public relations.
The competition to represent players in today’s sports
market can be a vigorous task. With so many agents and agencies in the game and
so many choices, players must decide what type of representation is the best
fit for them; should they go with an agent in a corporate empire? or with an
agent running a solo act?
The Pros of Agencies
-
Operate under corporate umbrellas
-
Represent a substantial number of professional
athlete clients, giving them a great amount of experience in dealing with
representation
-
Agencies often already have an extensive network
of important contacts in the industry like head coaches, owners of major league
teams etc.
-
Agencies have more resources and open avenues to
explore
-
Large agencies can easily monopolize on top
players making it easy for them to dominate the athlete representation market.
Look at CAA for instance; they have become the most dominant sports agency in
The United States because they represent many of the most successful players in
major sports leagues.
-
More experience on the “business” side of
athlete representation (sponsorships, endorsements, public relations etc.)
The Cons of Agencies
-
Its easier for an athlete to get lost in the
shuffle if he/she isn’t a top earning client
-
Athlete will probably experience less individual
attention and less face-to-face interaction
-
It might be harder for an agent to manage their
time, their business and their client base in a larger agency
The Pros of
Individual Agents
-
More personalized attention will come from
individual agents
-
More personalized counseling will come from
individual agents
-
Know your agent on a more personal level
-
Individual agents can be more invested in you
because they depend on you for their livelihood.
The Cons of
Individual Agents
-
Not as many resources available for
marketability
-
Agent could be less stable financially
-
Lack of big-name connections
-
Might not have as wide of a reach in the
industry as top agencies do
The bottom line is that athlete representation is about
relationships. There are agencies and agents out there for everyone, it just
depends what type of representation an athlete prefers. Whichever avenue an
athlete decides to go down, they should make sure they take their time to
explore the best options for their future careers.
No comments:
Post a Comment